| Omblog.net | |||
|
Blog Home By Month Recent Entries
Here are some links that we like: DailyKos Talking Points Memo Huffington Post Current TV -TYT The Young Turks Sam Seder Oliver Willis Maddow Blog Cliff Schector Bob Cesca Hullabaloo Media Matters Dean Baker Paul Krugman Rober Reich Jared Bernstein Tax.com Mahablog Frank Schaeffer FOKNews Channel Eric Alterman Glenn Greenwald Political Correction Matt Taibbi Atrios AlterNet Ezra Klein Kevin Drum John Cole Juan Cole Matthew Yglesias Firedoglake Dome on the Range Leftyblogs/Kansas Leftyblogs/Missouri Best of the Blogs Firedup Missouri Show Me Progress BAGnewNotes Baseline Scenario Zero Hedge Calculated Risk The Big Picture Tapped Blogs TPM Muckraker TPM Cafe Talk To Action Bartholomew 's Notes Things You Wouldn't Know... Rumproast The Daily Beast FAIR Blog The Authoritarians Bonddad Blog FiveThirtyEight Consumerist Future Majority ThinkProgress Campus Progress Center for American Progress OurFuture.org Crooks and Liars : AFLCIOnow Gun Guys Jesus' General Flying Spaghetti Monster Max Blumenthal Truthout BuzzFlash.com The Nation AlterNet News Hounds Liberal Oasis The Raw Story American Rights at Work
Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)
|
Blog Home : July 2008 : 2008-07-28 to 2008-08-03
Promotional video from Virgin Galactic. Pretty Cool
BAGnewsNotes
Think Progress
Desipite yesterday's explosive report confirming that top Justice Department officials, including Monica Goodling and Kyle Sampson, had violated federal law, the White House press corps has not asked White House press secretary Dana Perino a single question about it. Both yesterday's and today's press briefings included no discussion of the report, nor a question on whether Attorney General Mukasey would follow through on a criminal perjury referral from Congress.
In 2001 George Bush inherited the largest budget surplus in American history from Bill Clinton.
Mark and Becky Harmon attend TVUUC and were present. Hear their perspective:
Speaker Nancy Pelosi
The president knows, as his own administration has stated, that the impact of any new drilling will be insignificant -- promising savings of only pennies per gallon many years down the road. Americans know that thanks to the two oilmen in the White House, consumers are now paying $4 a gallon for gas. But what Americans should realize is that what the president is calling for is drilling as close as three miles off of America's pristine beaches and in other protected areas.
The president has failed in his economic policy, and now he wants to say, 'but for drilling in protected areas offshore, our economy would be thriving and the price of gas would be lower.' That hoax is unworthy of the serious debate we must have to relieve the pain of consumers at the pump and to promote energy independence.
Today, the New Direction Congress will vote on legislation to bring down gas prices by taking crucial steps to curb excessive speculation in the energy futures market. The president himself could lower prices by drawing down a small portion of our government oil stockpile, the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. The New Direction Congress will continue to bring forth responsible proposals to increase supply, reduce prices, protect consumers, and transition America to a clean, renewable energy independent future.
Juan Cole
.....Aside from defining what proponents mean by the "surge," all kinds of things are claimed for it that are not in evidence. The assertion depends on a possible logical fallacy: post hoc ergo propter hoc. If event X comes after event Y, it is natural to suspect that Y caused X. But it would often be a false assumption. Thus, actress Sharon Stone alleged that the recent earthquake in China was caused by China's crackdown on Tibetan protesters. That is just superstition, and callous superstition at that. It is a good illustration, however, of the very logical fallacy to which I am referring.
For the first six months of the troop escalation, high rates of violence continued unabated. That is suspicious. What exactly were U.S. troops doing differently from September than they were doing in May, such that there was such a big change? The answer to that question is simply not clear. Note that the troop escalation only brought U.S. force strength up to what it had been in late 2005. In a country of 27 million, 30,000 extra U.S. troops are highly unlikely to have had a really major impact, when they had not before.
As best I can piece it together, what actually seems to have happened was that the escalation troops began by disarming the Sunni Arabs in Baghdad. Once these Sunnis were left helpless, the Shiite militias came in at night and ethnically cleansed them......
Walmart Watch
Today’s Wall Street Journal story demonstrates once again that Wal-Mart intimidates its workers. Whether it is locking them in the company’s stores, pressuring them to keep working even after they have clocked out, or giving them "instruction" about their vote, Wal-Mart has consistently exhibited unique examples of unethical behavior that often raise legal questions.
"We have been receiving the reports described in the Journal for the past week. Some of the reports we received were even more egregious than what was described in today’s story. In one case, a worker said they were shown a slide that said "Obama = union" and then were told why unions were bad.
"The stories cited in the Journal are consistent with the numerous stories we hear from employees across the nation every day about Wal-Mart’s intimidation tactics. All of these tactics seem to be designed to keep workers from demanding better wages, decent benefits or fairer working conditions. Wal-Mart seems willing to do anything to maintain a status quo in which the company pays poorly, refuses to compensate workers for time worked, discriminates against workers and offers poor benefits.
Noel Koch
....In the end, it was John McCain, brutalized as a prisoner of war, who completed his Vietnam service by leading the fight to lance the boil of bitterness that disfigured the face of America in the aftermath of the war. It was John McCain, much honored for his wartime heroism, who brought further honor upon himself by standing for reconciliation with an old foe. Implicit in McCain's healing leadership was the understanding that our withdrawal from Vietnam, where our nation lost a war but our warriors never lost a battle, did not disgrace the memory of the more than 58,000 who died there.....
....So, it is a sorrow now to hear John McCain, in pursuit of the White House, accusing Senator Barack Obama of dishonoring the sacrifices of American soldiers by calling for the withdrawal of US forces from a conflict promoted, as was Vietnam, by deceiving the American people. It is inexplicable, as the war in Iraq itself is inexplicable, that Senator McCain should charge that Barack Obama "is willing to lose a war in order to win the presidency." Buried near the surface of that discreditable allegation is the insistence that America must put still more of its best at risk in order to redeem those it has already lost.
The Senator insists we must win in Iraq. Yet, after a war that has lasted longer than World War II, and after the loss of more than 4,000 American lives, a definition of "winning" has still to be offered by the authors of this fiasco and their supporters. Senator Obama's fitness to be Commander-in-Chief is reaffirmed by his determination to end this folly, despite attacks on his motives and his patriotism. It was that determination that has served to persuade Iraq that it must now put its own house in order. And that is as close to "winning" as we are going to get in this war.
It is often said, and correctly, that Iraq is a very different war from Vietnam, but this much they have in common: American lives were wasted in Vietnam and they are being wasted in Iraq. However much American blood is shed in that sour soil, it will not be sweetened sufficiently to nurture up the seeds of democracy.
Bob Herbert, NYT
Gee, I wonder why, if you have a black man running for high public office - say, Barack Obama or Harold Ford - the opposition feels compelled to run low-life political ads featuring tacky, sexually provocative white women who have no connection whatsoever to the black male candidates.
Spare me any more drivel about the high-mindedness of John McCain. You knew something was up back in March when, in his first ad of the general campaign, Mr. McCain had himself touted as "the American president Americans have been waiting for."
There was nothing subtle about that attempt to position Senator Obama as the Other, a candidate who might technically be American but who remained in some sense foreign, not sufficiently patriotic and certainly not one of us - the "us" being the genuine red-white-and-blue Americans who the ad was aimed at.
Glenn Greenwald, Salon
.....Much more important than the general attempt to link the
anthrax to
Islamic terrorists, there was a specific intent -- indispensably aided
by ABC News -- to link the anthrax attacks to Iraq and Saddam Hussein.
In my view, and I've written about this several
times and in
great detail
to no avail, the role played by ABC News in this episode is the single
greatest, unresolved media scandal of this decade. News of Ivins'
suicide, which means (presumably) that the anthrax attacks originated
from Ft. Detrick, adds critical new facts and heightens how scandalous
ABC News' conduct continues to be in this matter.
During the last week of October, 2001, ABC News, led by Brian Ross, continuously
trumpeted the claim as their top news story
that government tests conducted on the anthrax -- tests
conducted at Ft. Detrick
-- revealed that the anthrax sent to Daschele contained the chemical
additive known as bentonite. ABC News, including Peter Jennings,
repeatedly claimed that the presence of bentonite in the anthrax was compelling
evidence that Iraq was responsible for the attacks,
since -- as ABC variously claimed -- bentonite "is a trademark of Iraqi
leader Saddam Hussein's biological weapons program" and "only one
country, Iraq, has used bentonite to produce biological weapons."
ABC News' claim -- which they said came at first from "three
well-placed but separate sources," followed by "four well-placed and
separate sources" -- was completely false from the beginning. There
never was any bentonite detected in the anthrax (a fact ABC News acknowledged
for the first time in 2007
only as a result of my badgering them about this issue). It's critical
to note that it isn't the case that preliminary tests really did detect
bentonite and then subsequent tests found there was none. No
tests ever found or even suggested the presence of bentonite.
The claim was just concocted from the start. It just never happened.
That means that ABC News' "four well-placed and separate sources" fed
them information that was completely false
-- false information that created a very significant link in the public
mind between the anthrax attacks and Saddam Hussein. And look where --
according to Brian Ross' report on October 28, 2001 -- these tests were
conducted:
Bob Cesca
....If by "one of us" he means a cranky, elitist, white, corporate
media, man-shaped bunion who fashioned his career by demonizing brown
people, the answer is a certain 'no'. But we know what Buchanan meant
by this. Is Senator Obama with "us" or is he with the uppity
blacks? Is he a real American like Senator McCain or is he a Muslim
terrorist like those e-mails suggest? Is he too European (GAY!)? Is he
like us: white, wealthy, conservative, elite? During this dark ride of the Bush years, it's no longer
surprising
or shocking to hear such a bottomless cup of awfulness. This line of
questioning has become the dominant theme in the corporate media's
political narrative. "Us" has become a baseline which liberals --
regardless of race or gender -- will never achieve because the
experiment is stacked against anyone who isn't centrist, moderate,
right of center or conservative.....
Seymour Hersh - a Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist for The New Yorker - revealed that Bush administration officials held a meeting recently in the Vice President's office to discuss ways to provoke a war with Iran.
In Hersh's most recent article, he reports that this meeting occurred in the wake of the overblown incident in the Strait of Hormuz, when a U.S. carrier almost shot at a few small Iranian speedboats. The "meeting took place in the Vice-President's office. 'The subject was how to create a casus belli between Tehran and Washington,'" according to one of Hersh's sources.
| ||