| Omblog.net | |||
|
Blog Home By Month Recent Entries
Here are some links that we like: DailyKos Talking Points Memo Huffington Post Current TV -TYT The Young Turks Sam Seder Oliver Willis Maddow Blog Cliff Schector Bob Cesca Hullabaloo Media Matters Dean Baker Paul Krugman Rober Reich Jared Bernstein Tax.com Mahablog Frank Schaeffer FOKNews Channel Eric Alterman Glenn Greenwald Political Correction Matt Taibbi Atrios AlterNet Ezra Klein Kevin Drum John Cole Juan Cole Matthew Yglesias Firedoglake Dome on the Range Leftyblogs/Kansas Leftyblogs/Missouri Best of the Blogs Firedup Missouri Show Me Progress BAGnewNotes Baseline Scenario Zero Hedge Calculated Risk The Big Picture Tapped Blogs TPM Muckraker TPM Cafe Talk To Action Bartholomew 's Notes Things You Wouldn't Know... Rumproast The Daily Beast FAIR Blog The Authoritarians Bonddad Blog FiveThirtyEight Consumerist Future Majority ThinkProgress Campus Progress Center for American Progress OurFuture.org Crooks and Liars : AFLCIOnow Gun Guys Jesus' General Flying Spaghetti Monster Max Blumenthal Truthout BuzzFlash.com The Nation AlterNet News Hounds Liberal Oasis The Raw Story American Rights at Work
Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)
|
Blog Home : August 2008 : 2008-08-04 to 2008-08-10
Max Blumenthal
Last week, I reported
for the Huffington Post that country singer Toby Keith had
performed a
pro-lynching anthem on the Colbert Report, and would be playing the
same song soon on the Tonight Show with Jay Leno and a slew of
nationally televised talk shows. The lyrics of Keith's song, "Beer For My Horses," which I transcribed,
could hardly be less explicit -- "Hang 'em high, for all the people to
see." In my piece, I also noted the racially tinged nature of the
song's video and the forthcoming movie that Keith's song inspired.....
By Thomas Frank
....It is just this: Fantastic misgovernment of the kind we have seen is not an accident, nor is it the work of a few bad individuals. It is the consequence of triumph by a particular philosophy of government, by a movement that understands the liberal state as a perversion and considers the market the ideal nexus of human society. This movement is friendly to industry not just by force of campaign contributions but by conviction; it believes in entrepreneurship not merely in commerce but in politics; and the inevitable results of its ascendance are, first, the capture of the state by business and, second, all that follows: incompetence, graft, and all the other wretched flotsam that we've come to expect from Washington.....
....Its leaders laugh off the idea of the public interest as airy-fairy nonsense; they caution against bringing top-notch talent into government service; they declare war on public workers. They have made a cult of outsourcing and privatizing, they have wrecked established federal operations because they disagree with them, and they have deliberately piled up an Everest of debt in order to force the government into crisis. The ruination they have wrought has been thorough; it has been a professional job. Repairing it will require years of political action.
....When conservatives appoint the opponents of government agencies to head those government agencies; when they auction their official services to the purveyor of the most lavish "golf weekend"; when they mulch millions from groups with business before Congress; when they dynamite the Treasury and sabotage the regulatory process and force government shutdowns -- in short, when they treat government with contempt -- they are running true to form. They have not done these awful things because they are bad conservatives; they have done them because they are good conservatives, because these unsavory deeds follow naturally from the core doctrines of the conservative tradition.....
It's delicious that they [Wal-Mart] show exactly why the Employee Free Choice Act is so needed. The mechanism of intimidation an employer has over an employee is so powerful that running a union election has become incredibly difficult, almost impossible.
When your employer can have a mandatory meeting and sit you down in a room for hours on end showing anti-union propaganda or telling you who they think you should vote for. And you have to listen to them because you can’t walk out of that room and not get fired. Those are precisely the conditions the Employee Free Choice Act is designed to remedy.
Ron Suskind
What just happened? Evidence. A secret that has been judiciously kept for five years just spilled out. All of what follows is new, never reported in any way:
The Iraq Intelligence Chief, Tahir Jalil Habbush -- a man still carrying a $1 million reward for capture, the Jack of Diamonds in Bush's famous deck of wanted men -- has been America's secret source on Iraq. Starting in January of 2003, with Blair and Bush watching, his secret reports began to flow to officials on both sides of the Atlantic, saying that there were no WMD and that Hussein was acting so odd because of fear that the Iranians would find out he was a toothless tiger. The U.S. deep-sixed the intelligence report in February, "resettled" Habbush to a safe house in Jordan during the invasion and then paid him $5 million in what could only be considered hush money.
In the fall of 2003, after the world learned there were no WMD -- as Habbush had foretold -- the White House ordered the CIA to carry out a deception. The mission: create a handwritten letter, dated July, 2001, from Habbush to Saddam saying that Atta trained in Iraq before the attacks and the Saddam was buying yellow cake for Niger with help from a "small team from the al Qaeda organization." ......
Media Matters; by Jamison Foser
The eagerness with which the media have spread some truly
bizarre criticisms of Obama confirms this theory. Just think about some
of the things Obama has
seen the media portray as weaknesses.
He's too
popular and
respected. He's
too well-educated. His great speeches are attended
by many enthusiastic people -- just
like Hitler!
He's too fit. Yes: The Wall Street
Journal would have you believe that Barack Obama faces an
uphill
electoral climb because he may be "Too
Fit to Be President." Journal reporter Amy Chozick devoted more
than 1,300 words to exploring this pressing topic..... .....Chozick apparently had some trouble finding people to
support the crackpot premise that Obama's physical fitness might cause
voters to question his fitness for office, so she turned to trolling
Internet message boards in desperate search of
someone -- anyone -- she could quote. As the blog Sadly,
No! revealed,
Chozick posted
a Yahoo! Message Board
thread on July 15, asking, "Does anyone out
there think Barack Obama is too thin to be president? Anyone having a
hard time
relating to him and his 'no excess body fat'? Please let me know.
Thanks!" About three-and-a-half
hours later, Chozick
got her first response --
a post ridiculing her for her focus on "totally meaningless
drivel." Nearly
an hour after that, Chozick finally got the response she was looking
for. A user posting under the
name "onlinebeerbellygirl" wrote, "Yes I think He [sic] is to [sic]
skinny to be President. ... I won't vote for any beanpole guy." Chozick
quoted the post in
her article -- one of
only two quotes agreeing with the premise of the article. She did not,
however, disclose that the quote
had come only after she started a thread encouraging people to make
such
comments. After she got
caught, the Journal acknowledged:
"The article should have disclosed that the reporter used the bulletin
board to elicit the comment." There may be more to it than that. A post in a subsequent
Yahoo! Message Board discussion thread devoted to
Chozick's article noted
that "[n]either Chozick nor
'onlinebeerbellygirl' has made any other posts on Yahoo before or
since, and both profiles appear to have been created on 7/15, the day
Chozick
started the topics. It
certainly looks like Amy Chozick constructed the whole thing."
| ||