| Omblog.net | |||
|
Blog Home By Month Recent Entries
Here are some links that we like: DailyKos Talking Points Memo Huffington Post Current TV -TYT The Young Turks Sam Seder Oliver Willis Maddow Blog Cliff Schector Bob Cesca Hullabaloo Media Matters Dean Baker Paul Krugman Rober Reich Jared Bernstein Tax.com Mahablog Frank Schaeffer FOKNews Channel Eric Alterman Glenn Greenwald Political Correction Matt Taibbi Atrios AlterNet Ezra Klein Kevin Drum John Cole Juan Cole Matthew Yglesias Firedoglake Dome on the Range Leftyblogs/Kansas Leftyblogs/Missouri Best of the Blogs Firedup Missouri Show Me Progress BAGnewNotes Baseline Scenario Zero Hedge Calculated Risk The Big Picture Tapped Blogs TPM Muckraker TPM Cafe Talk To Action Bartholomew 's Notes Things You Wouldn't Know... Rumproast The Daily Beast FAIR Blog The Authoritarians Bonddad Blog FiveThirtyEight Consumerist Future Majority ThinkProgress Campus Progress Center for American Progress OurFuture.org Crooks and Liars : AFLCIOnow Gun Guys Jesus' General Flying Spaghetti Monster Max Blumenthal Truthout BuzzFlash.com The Nation AlterNet News Hounds Liberal Oasis The Raw Story American Rights at Work
Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)
|
Blog Home : August 2008 : 2008-08-18 to 2008-08-24
Drew Westen
......It isn't hard to come away with the central theme, because it's offered in both the opening sentence and at the end: That as long as we do not all share the same religious beliefs, the government has no business forcing one person to live by another person's faith. It speaks to religious freedom and government intrusion, two themes usually associated with narratives on the right but that should be central to a progressive narrative on abortion. It recognizes, as Obama did in his actual answer, that this is a moral issue, and it builds on common ground, emphasizing themes like reducing teen pregnancies and instilling values that are shared by both the left and right and hence are likely to be compelling to people in the center. And it re-enfranchises males by reminding men that they have a stake in this, too: that although ultimately the decision to abort or not to abort resides with the mother, women usually make these decisions together with their husbands or boyfriends, and that a woman or couple, not the government, should make these kinds of intensely personal decisions.......
Jack Cafferty
It occurs to me that John McCain is as intellectually shallow as our current president.
and
I am sick and tired of the president of the United States embarrassing me. The world we live in is too complex to entrust it to someone else whose idea of intellectual curiosity and grasp of foreign policy issues is to tell us he can look into Vladimir Putin's eyes and see into his soul.
George Bush's record as a student, military man, businessman and leader of the free world is one of constant failure. And the part that troubles me most is he seems content with himself.
He will leave office with the country $10 trillion in debt, fighting two wars, our international reputation in shambles, our government cloaked in secrecy and suspicion that his entire presidency has been a litany of broken laws and promises, our citizens' faith in our own country ripped to shreds. Yet Bush goes bumbling along, grinning and spewing moronic one-liners, as though nobody understands what a colossal failure he has been.
I fear to the depth of my being that John McCain is just like him.
Jonathan Rowe, Talk2Action
The bottom line is that evangelicals and traditional Catholics define "Christianity" fairly narrowly according to its orthodox doctrines. How many times have we heard evangelicals (and some Catholics) say "Mormons are not Christians" even though Mormons claim to be Christian.
According to the way evangelicals define Christianity it's not at all clear that we had a "real Christian" President until Andrew Jackson.
Christian Nationalists are largely comprised of conservative evangelicals. Understandably, they have a hard time accepting the first half dozen Presidents weren't Christians (it doesn't bode well for a "Christian America" reading of history).
That's what we're talking about!
I will not stand by and watch the Obama camp try to claim McCain owns seven homes when he owns at least ten.
--Josh Marshall
From
TPM Election Central:
Mary Pat Flaherty, The Washington Post:
"A voting system used in 34 states contains a critical programming error that can cause votes to be dropped while being electronically transferred from memory cards to a central tallying point, the manufacturer acknowledges. The problem was identified after complaints from Ohio elections officials following the March primary there, but the logic error that is the root of the problem has been part of the software for 10 years, said Chris Riggall, a spokesman for Premier Election Solutions, formerly known as Diebold."
Paul Krugman, The New York Times
Last weekend, Pastor Rick Warren asked both presidential candidates to define the income at which "you move from middle class to rich." The context of the question was, of course, the difference in the candidates’ tax policies. Barack Obama wants to put tax rates on higher-income Americans more or less back to what they were under Bill Clinton; John McCain, who was against the Bush tax cuts before he was for them, says that means raising taxes on the middle class.
Mr. Obama answered the question seriously, defining middle class as meaning an income below $150,000. Mr. McCain, at first, made it into a joke, saying "how about $5 million?" Then he declared that it didn’t matter because he wouldn’t raise anyone’s taxes. That wasn’t just an evasion, it was a falsehood: Mr. McCain’s health care plan, by limiting the deductibility of employer-paid insurance premiums, would effectively raise taxes on a number of people.
The real problem, however, was with the question itself.....
.....The trouble with Mr. Warren's question was that it seemed to imply that everyone except the poor belongs to one of these two categories: either you’re clearly rich, or you’re an ordinary member of the middle class. And that’s just wrong.
Lee Camp, 236.com
Austin Cline
....Some Christians actively seek out ridicule and contempt through deliberately obnoxious behavior. But for them, that's just being good Christians ......
Brian
Elroy McKinley, a Christian, writes about an encounter he had
with a couple of Christians who objected to McKinley's earring:
If you look again at the emphasized text, you'll notice that
the
speaker doesn't seem to care if they actually convert anyone
— changing
people's minds so they become Christian seems to be less important than
becoming more "holy" in the eyes of God. This confirms something I've
long wondered about and strongly suspected: that many Christians
proselytize not so much in the real desire to convert us atheists, but
rather because they are trying to earn brownie points from their god......
BagNewNotes
1a. You get the feeling that Biden can do for Obama what the guy in the backpack is doing for him. Too bad American politics -- especially the way the GOP plays it -- is so much about manhood, but that's the game.
1b. Biden is one of the few liberals that could pull off a scene like this.
2. He's been to Iraq eight times. In February, he was in Pakistan and Afghanistan (above). And he just returned from Georgia where he met with Saakashvili. Biden is so deep in foreign policy, a shot like this seems more generalized than specific.
3. Biden also looks like the senior statesman, especially in contrast to the skinny kid with the glasses. Offers some real contrast to McCain in that Navy hat.
Frank Rich, NYT
.......What we have learned this summer is this: McCain’s
trigger-happy
temperament and reactionary policies offer worse than no change. He is
an unstable bridge back not just to Bush policies but to an
increasingly distant 20th-century America that is still fighting Red
China in Vietnam and the Soviet Union in the cold war. As the country
tries to navigate the fast-moving changes of the 21st century, McCain
would put America on hold. What Obama also should have learned by
now is that the press is not his friend. Of course, he gets more ink
and airtime than McCain; he’s sexier news. But as George
Mason
University’s Center for Media and Public Affairs documented
in
its study
of six weeks of TV news reports this summer, Obama’s coverage
was 28
percent positive, 72 percent negative. (For McCain, the split was
43/57.) Even McCain’s most blatant confusions, memory lapses
and
outright lies still barely cause a ripple, whether he’s
railing against
a piece of pork he in
fact voted for, as he did at the
Saddleback Church pseudodebate last weekend, or falsifying
crucial details of his marital history in his memoirs, as The Los
Angeles Times uncovered
in court records last month........
This week – once again – a US air strike killed a
large number of
Afghan civilians. The numbers are indefinite, somewhere between 76 and
90; the precise details still being filled in by various
investigations. But again, again … bombs fell and famiies
were
destroyed.
Today our White House issued
a statement: "We regret the loss of life among the
innocent Afghanis who we are committed to protect," White House
spokesman Tony Fratto said. Once again, the words of “regret”
– after days of denial. How many
times have we read the same words – following the same air
strikes in
Afghanistan and in Iraq. Regret – but we have not once seen
an example
of accountability. Excuses are made – “insurgents”
were gathering, firing, or
“gathering” in the vicinity - and after the fact,
there are always
"investigations" but the strategy of bombing without regard for
civilian homes and lives never seems to change. With today’s news of our
“regret” there was also news
of at least one effort at accountability. Afghan president
Karzai condemned the strikes and: Major General Jalandar Shah Behnam,
commander of the 207th Corps, based in Herat, and Major Abdul Jabar,
commander of a special forces battalion, were removed from their posts
for negligence and for "concealing the truth," a statement from the
presidential office said.
Disabled American Veterans is an organization that was founded following World War I, and today has 1.4 million members.
It not only tracks this legislation, but tracks how politicians vote. John McCain is documented as having voted with DAV-supported legislation 34 percent of the time. Barack Obama has voted with the DAV 89 percent of the time.
| ||