| Omblog.net | |||
|
Blog Home By Month Recent Entries
Here are some links that we like: DailyKos Talking Points Memo Huffington Post Current TV -TYT The Young Turks Sam Seder Oliver Willis Maddow Blog Cliff Schector Bob Cesca Hullabaloo Media Matters Dean Baker Paul Krugman Rober Reich Jared Bernstein Tax.com Mahablog Frank Schaeffer FOKNews Channel Eric Alterman Glenn Greenwald Political Correction Matt Taibbi Atrios AlterNet Ezra Klein Kevin Drum John Cole Juan Cole Matthew Yglesias Firedoglake Dome on the Range Leftyblogs/Kansas Leftyblogs/Missouri Best of the Blogs Firedup Missouri Show Me Progress BAGnewNotes Baseline Scenario Zero Hedge Calculated Risk The Big Picture Tapped Blogs TPM Muckraker TPM Cafe Talk To Action Bartholomew 's Notes Things You Wouldn't Know... Rumproast The Daily Beast FAIR Blog The Authoritarians Bonddad Blog FiveThirtyEight Consumerist Future Majority ThinkProgress Campus Progress Center for American Progress OurFuture.org Crooks and Liars : AFLCIOnow Gun Guys Jesus' General Flying Spaghetti Monster Max Blumenthal Truthout BuzzFlash.com The Nation AlterNet News Hounds Liberal Oasis The Raw Story American Rights at Work
Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)
|
Blog Home : September 2008 : 2008-09-15 to 2008-09-21
Bonddad
....So let's sum up. Real (inflation adjusted) incomes for the vast majority of Americans declined this expansion. At the same time, people were already spending most of their incomes at the beginning of this expansion yet they continued to increased their spending for the duration of this expansion. Where did all of the new money for increased spending come from?
Tons of debt. At the beginning of this expansion total household debt outstanding stood at $7.6 trillion. That current figure is $13.9 trillion. That's an increase of 82%. To place that figure in perspective, total household debt outstanding is now almost as large as total US GDP. All of that does not exist in a vacuum; it has to go somewhere. And that's where we get to the current problems in the markets.....
....So, let's sum up all the points made above.
1.) Incomes shrank for most Americans over the last expansion.
2.) But Americans kept spending thanks to a mammoth increase in household debt.
3.) To increase the amount of debt in the system, lending standards were lowered.
4.) Lowered lending standards have led to a higher default rate from borrowers.
5.) Higher default rates have lowered the value of all the collateral backed by mortgages.
6.) Lowered collateral values have killed the balance sheets of literally every major financial company.
Robert F Kennedy, Jr.
Fascist writer Westbrook Pegler, an avowed racist who Sarah Palin approvingly quoted in her acceptance speech for the moral superiority of small town values, expressed his fervent hope about my father, Robert F. Kennedy, as he contemplated his own run for the presidency in 1965, that "some white patriot of the Southern tier will spatter his spoonful of brains in public premises before the snow flies."
It might be worth asking Governor Palin for a tally of the other favorites from her reading list.
Deepak Chopra
Sometimes politics has the uncanny effect of mirroring the national psyche even when nobody intended to do that. .....
.....She is the reverse of Barack Obama, in essence his shadow, deriding his idealism and exhorting people to obey their worst impulses. In psychological terms the shadow is that part of the psyche that hides out of sight, countering our aspirations, virtue, and vision with qualities we are ashamed to face: anger, fear, revenge, violence, selfishness, and suspicion of "the other." For millions of Americans, Obama triggers those feelings, but they don't want to express them. He is calling for us to reach for our higher selves, and frankly, that stirs up hidden reactions of an unsavory kind. (Just to be perfectly clear, I am not making a verbal play out of the fact that Sen. Obama is black. The shadow is a metaphor widely in use before his arrival on the scene.) I recognize that psychological analysis of politics is usually not welcome by the public, but I believe such a perspective can be helpful here to understand Palin's message. In her acceptance speech Gov. Palin sent a rousing call to those who want to celebrate their resistance to change and a higher vision.
Look at what she stands for:
Paul Krugman, NYT
.......To understand the problem, you need to know that the old world of banking, in which institutions housed in big marble buildings accepted deposits and lent the money out to long-term clients, has largely vanished, replaced by what is widely called the "shadow banking system." Depository banks, the guys in the marble buildings, now play only a minor role in channeling funds from savers to borrowers; most of the business of finance is carried out through complex deals arranged by "nondepository" institutions, institutions like the late lamented Bear Stearns - and Lehman.
The new system was supposed to do a better job of spreading and reducing risk. But in the aftermath of the housing bust and the resulting mortgage crisis, it seems apparent that risk wasn't so much reduced as hidden: all too many investors had no idea how exposed they were.
And as the unknown unknowns have turned into known unknowns, the system has been experiencing postmodern bank runs. These don't look like the old-fashioned version: with few exceptions, we're not talking about mobs of distraught depositors pounding on closed bank doors. Instead, we're talking about frantic phone calls and mouse clicks, as financial players pull credit lines and try to unwind counterparty risk. But the economic effects - a freezing up of credit, a downward spiral in asset values - are the same as those of the great bank runs of the 1930s.
And here's the thing: The defenses set up to prevent a return of those bank runs, mainly deposit insurance and access to credit lines with the Federal Reserve, only protect the guys in the marble buildings, who aren't at the heart of the current crisis. That creates the real possibility that 2008 could be 1931 revisited.......
Arianna Huffington
Sarah Palin may not have known what the Bush Doctrine was, but we're getting a pretty good idea of what the Palin Doctrine is. According to London's Daily Telegraph, the architects of the Palin Doctrine are a group of people who have been singularly wrong about virtually everything in the last decade -- the neocons, who have been briefing Palin for weeks. She's perfect for the neocons: likeable on the outside, a blank slate on the inside. They first fell in love with her in 2007, during a Weekly Standard-sponsored cruise. So nice to meet you, Governor. And don't forget, mai tais and preemptive invasions on the Lido Deck at four!
ShadowSD, DailyKos
Maya Schenwar
Unless you make more than $2.87 million per year, Barack Obama will not raise your taxes. In fact, he will probably cut them.
This reality has been trampled, twisted, turned inside out and scribbled over so many times by the McCain campaign that it is hardly recognizable amid the clutter, but the fact remains: Obama's plan would grant tax cuts to all Americans making less than $226,982 per year, with the largest cuts going to the poorest individuals. Only the wealthiest 0.1 percent of earners would have to pay more.
DAYTON, TN - A steady stream of devoted evolutionists continued to gather in this small Tennessee town today to witness what many believe is an image of Charles Darwin - author of The Origin Of Species and founder of the modern evolutionary movement - made manifest on a concrete wall in downtown Dayton.
"I brought my baby to touch the wall, so that the power of Darwin can purify her genetic makeup of undesirable inherited traits," said Darlene Freiberg, one among a growing crowd assembled here to see the mysterious stain, which appeared last Monday on one side of the Rhea County Courthouse. The building was also the location of the famed "Scopes Monkey Trial" and is widely considered one of Darwinism's holiest sites. "Forgive me, O Charles, for ever doubting your Divine Evolution. After seeing this miracle of limestone pigmentation with my own eyes, my faith in empirical reasoning will never again be tested." - The Onion -
by mikeypaw, DailyKos
A major shoe in the financial
industry has just fallen that may have far reaching impact for every
day Americans. The Sacred $1.00 share value for money funds has just
been breached. This is being reported by Bloomberg
News and has the potential to rile the markets even more than
they already are. Sept. 16 (Bloomberg) -- Reserve Primary Fund, a money-market
mutual
fund with $64.8 billion in assets as of Aug. 31, fell below $1 a share
in net asset value because of losses on debt issued by Lehman Brothers
Holdings Inc.
Money Market funds are a staple of the financial industry and
are
the place where most people park their funds when they are looking for
a safe return. These funds are routinely considered to be the same as
cash. That is to say that you can get to your money at anytime without
penalty and without delay. The
fact that Reserve Primary fund fell below the sacred $1.00 redemption
price could have far reaching implications for the entire financial
sector. Remember money funds are nearly ubiquitous throughout the
entire financial sector and they are used for everything from corporate
cash management to a parking place for un-invested funds of a
pensioner. These funds sole raison d etre is to provide liquidity and
safety for investors.
'No market for old men,' TCW investment strategist warns in gloomy forecast
By Jonathan Burton, MarketWatch
Jeffrey Gundlach, chief investment officer at Los Angeles-based mutual-fund company TCW Group Inc., told clients on a conference call late Wednesday that the crisis in credit and housing may not abate for several years and is actually getting worse......
.....Gundlach based his assessment on a belief that housing prices still face several more years of decline, a protracted slump, he said, not seen since the Great Depression. Moreover, Gundlach said it's possible that home prices could be sluggish until 2022.
"If it's like the Depression experience -- and it sure is shaping up that way -- it could take several years.Maybe we won't see a bottom in home prices until 2014," he said.
Write-offs could top $1 trillion
My fellow Americans, I am here to speechicate to you today about the economy and to tell you the money surge is working.
Just like when I bull-horned you all to go shopping after 9-11, I'm telling you to go shopping for stocks in the market place with all the stocks. I promise I will hunt down the terrorist killers who have been responsible for attacking Wall Street and smoke them out, dead or alive.
I am pleased that we have made sure that the wealth will stay with the wealthy who can continue their trickling down all over the American people.
How the "Bailouts" Taught Shareholders About "Transparency"
By Robert Folsom, EWT
......And, finally, now that you know
what the regulators were not
doing, there's the question of what they were
doing. Keeping in mind that regulators actually regulate participants in a given market, let me
summarize: a) They never
regulated market participants with the greatest potential of blowing up
the system, such as hedge funds and credit default swaps b) They deregulated
market participants such as Bear, Lehman & AIG, who depended on
the unregulated market participants c) They retained
regulatory control over market participants that had the least potential of doing damage, such as
short-sellers. Run a Google news search on "SEC" and "short sellers" to
see what I mean......
Jed Report
In the wake of the revelation that in 1995 Sarah Palin's reading materials included a copy of the John Birch Society Magazine, it seems to me that the media and intellectually honest conservatives should take another look at her ties with the pro-secessionist and Bircher sympathetic Alaskan Independence Party (AIP).
Even though Sarah Palin was not an AIP member, her husband Todd was a registered member from 1995-2002. Moreover, in 2000 Sarah Palin attended an AIP convention, and in 2006 and 2008 Palin recorded a video greeting for the AIP convention. Until it became a major campaign issue, members of the AIP said they had seen both Palins at party meetings in the mid-1990s.
John Ridley
No, Rush didn't put one of those delightful "Just Hang in
There"
kitty- cat posters up in his "heavily fortified bunker." But according
to a rather weepy
piece in the Wall Street Journal, Rush
is upset that the Obama camp is portraying him as being a bigot. By quoting a bigoted statement he's made. The Obama campaign is running new Spanish language ads in
Colorado,
Nevada and New Mexico which quote Limbaugh as using the phrase "stupid
and unskilled Mexicans" and telling Mexicans to "shut your mouth, or
get out" of America. In his WSJ piece Limbaugh doesn't deny
making the statements. His issue is that the statements are taken out
of context. Context?
| ||