Omblog.net
Blog Home
By Month
Recent Entries

Send email to omblog.net
Here are some links that we like:
DailyKos
Talking Points Memo
Huffington Post
Current TV -TYT
The Young Turks
Sam Seder
Oliver Willis
Maddow Blog
Cliff Schector
Bob Cesca
Hullabaloo
Media Matters
Dean Baker
Paul Krugman
Rober Reich
Jared Bernstein
Tax.com
Mahablog
Frank Schaeffer
FOKNews Channel
Eric Alterman
Glenn Greenwald
Political Correction
Matt Taibbi
Atrios
AlterNet
Ezra Klein
Kevin Drum
John Cole
Juan Cole
Matthew Yglesias
Firedoglake
Dome on the Range
Leftyblogs/Kansas
Leftyblogs/Missouri
Best of the Blogs
Firedup Missouri
Show Me Progress
BAGnewNotes
Baseline Scenario
Zero Hedge
Calculated Risk
The Big Picture
Tapped Blogs
TPM Muckraker
TPM Cafe
Talk To Action
Bartholomew 's Notes
Things You Wouldn't Know...
Rumproast
The Daily Beast
FAIR Blog
The Authoritarians
Bonddad Blog
FiveThirtyEight
Consumerist
Future Majority
ThinkProgress
Campus Progress
Center for American Progress
OurFuture.org
Crooks and Liars :
AFLCIOnow
Gun Guys
Jesus' General
Flying Spaghetti Monster
Max Blumenthal

Truthout
BuzzFlash.com
The Nation
AlterNet
News Hounds
Liberal Oasis
The Raw Story
American Rights at Work


Search this site powered by FreeFind
How is news coverage working for you? Pop Quiz: How Many soldiers have we lost this Month?

Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)


legitgov

4more

sweetjesus

Jesus' General


Blog Home : September 2008 : 2008-09-29 to 2008-10-05

Muslim Children Gassed at Dayton Mosque After "Obsession" DVD Hits Ohio

Chris Rodda

On Friday, September 26, the end of a week in which thousands of copies of Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against the West -- the fear-mongering, anti-Muslim documentary being distributed by the millions in swing states via DVDs inserted in major newspapers and through the U.S. mail -- were distributed by mail in Ohio, a "chemical irritant" was sprayed through a window of the Islamic Society of Greater Dayton, where 300 people were gathered for a Ramadan prayer service.

The room that the chemical was sprayed into was the room where babies and children were being kept while their mothers were engaged in prayers. This, apparently, is what the scare tactic political campaigning of John McCain's supporters has led to -- Americans perpetrating a terrorist attack against innocent children on American soil.

(Go to URL for more.)

(Permalink)

I'll Admit This Is Pretty Mavericky

Atrios

Politico: Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and his top aides took credit for building a winning bailout coalition - hours before the vote failed and stocks tanked.

(Go to URL for more.)

(Permalink)

Fox News Idiot

(Permalink)

Conservatives Seek To Shift Blame For Crisis Onto Minority Housing Law

Thomas B. Edsall, Huffpost

Blame for the current economic crisis has been laid on many doorsteps, including the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999; credit default swaps; hedge funds; the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000; Alan Greenspan; and Phil and Wendy Gramm.

But it has fallen to right-wing pundit Ann Coulter to blaze a truly simple path through the maze of credit derivatives, collateralized loan obligations, tranches, securitization transactions, and Thomson Financial League Tables.

This gentle lady spells out the source and origin of the current economic crisis:

"THEY GAVE YOUR MORTGAGE TO A LESS QUALIFIED MINORITY!"

Coulter is putting forward an argument popular (who could be surprised?) among besieged conservatives, that "social engineering" is the root cause of the current economic crisis -- in the form of a 31-year-old law passed during the Carter administration by a Democratic Congress, the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977.

(Go to URL for more.)

(Permalink)

Don't Vote

(Go to URL for more.)

(Permalink)

Nothing Proposed Will Solve the Credit Crisis

Hale "Bonddad" Stewart

....There are several really big assumptions in the above scenario that make no sense.

1.) The biggest stupidity is the government thinks these assets are undervalued right now and will eventually rise in value. Really. That's nice. And who is the wizard with the crystal ball? Has it occurred to anybody that these assets are correctly valued at current levels and will continue to drop? But Bonddad... Hank Paulson says that won't happen. The same thing goes for Bernanke. Neither of them saw this coming either, meaning their judgment is really suspect......

(Go to URL for more.)

(Permalink)

Palin's Apocalypse

Harry Hanbury

Does Sarah Palin believe in the Anti-Christ? Does she believe true Christians will be whisked up to heaven sometime in the near future? Does she expect Jesus to come back to earth in our lifetime and battle the armies of Satan? Which nations would participate in the Battle of Armageddon, and whose side would they be on? These questions seem far out, but they're not. They cut to the core of Palin's perspectives on who holds power in our world, on humanity's future, and on foreign affairs....

Watch Video

.....While producing the American News Project video Palin's Apocalypse, I've been astonished at how the media avoid these questions like kryptonite - presumably for fear of being branded anti-religious or becoming the target of a boycott by fundamentalists. But Berlet, who identifies himself as "Christian and a reporter," urges his colleagues to overcome their fears......

(Go to URL for more.)

(Permalink)

The Vice-Presidential Debate

NYT

....Ms. Palin condemned Wall Street greed and said she and Mr. McCain would "demand" strict oversight. In virtually the next breath, she said government should "get out of the way" of American business....

.....In the end, the debate did not change the essential truth of Ms. Palin’s candidacy: Mr. McCain made a wildly irresponsible choice that shattered the image he created for himself as the honest, seasoned, experienced man of principle and judgment. It was either an act of incredible cynicism or appallingly bad judgment.

(Go to URL for more.)

(Permalink)

Conservatives Blame Minorities

The Progress Report

BLAME IT ON THE CRA: For weeks, conservatives have blamed the 1977 Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), a bill aimed at helping minorities and low-income Americans obtain mortgages, for somehow causing today's crisis. Blaming the CRA has become a favorite conservative talking point, peddled recently by Charles Krauthammer, Fox News, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Times, and the National Review. Conservatives often move from blaming the CRA to blaming minorities themselves. Fox News's Neil Cavuto faulted the CRA's encouraging of "loaning to minorities and other risky folks." Bachmann last week criticized attempts to push "homeownership as a way to open the door for blacks and other minorities to enter the middle class." In response, Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) and other Congressional Black Caucus members wrote to Boehner asking whether all conservatives believe that "it was lending to minority communities that caused the financial crisis." Ellison also pointed out that the CRA applies only to commercial banks, not independent mortgage companies, which created the majority of subprime loans. "The fact is, CRAs probably reduced the impact of this problem because they limited the ability for a subprime loan to be issued through banks because they were regulated," he said. As the Center for American Progress's Robert Gordon has noted, "[T]he real problems came from the institutions beyond the reach of the CRA." CRA institutions engaged in less dangerous lending, as independent mortgage companies "made high-priced loans at more than twice the rate of the banks and thrifts."

BLAME IT ON UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS: Perhaps the most absurd finger-pointing came from far-right commenter Michelle Malkin, who insisted that "illegal immigration, crime-enabling banks, and open-borders Bush policies fueled the mortgage crisis." She continued, "Half of the mortgages to Hispanics are subprime (the accursed species of loan to borrowers with the shadiest credit histories). A quarter of all those subprime loans are in default and foreclosure." She quoted a Washington Post report noting that "Hispanics...have been courted aggressively by real estate agents, mortgage brokers and programs," implying no difference between Hispanics and undocumented immigrants. Rep. Virgil Goode (R-VA) declared "the most important thing" the "government needs to do to stop the financial crisis...is to 'stop encouraging loans to persons who cannot afford to pay them back' -- including illegal immigrants." The Center for American Progress's David Abromowitz slammed Malkin's ridiculous claims. He pointed out that 56 percent of subprime loans went to non-Hispanic whites, while "Hispanics constituted 14 percent of the borrower community and received 20 percent of the subprime loans." "In other words, the vast majority of borrowers getting subprime loans -- and therefore most of those going into default -- were not Hispanics, let alone illegal immigrants." Abromowitz concluded, "This predictable 'blame the Hispanics' rhetoric would all be so laughable if we didn't have an astoundingly dangerous economic situation rooted in plunging home values and foreclosures facing America today."

(Go to URL for more.)

(Permalink)

McCain Wants the Largest Tax Increase in American History

If your family makes $40,000, he wants you to pay taxes on $52,000 by adding in your employer health benefits.

(Permalink)

The Era of Angry Populism

Robert Reich

.....The larger economic outlook is not encouraging. All signs point to the economy worsening, bailout or no bailout. Unemployment will continue to rise. Median earnings will continue to drop, adjusted for inflation. More Americans will lose their health insurance.

The Era of Angry Populism has only just begun. Let's hope Obama wins, and is able to mobilize the anger into fierce pressure on Congress to get his agenda enacted, as well as reform Wall Street and Washington.

(Go to URL for more.)

(Permalink)

Naomi Klein Explains Shock Doctrine on Colbert

(Go to URL for more.)

(Permalink)

Credit Default Swaps Totalled 62 TRILLION Dollars last December - Not Regulated

Excerpted from The Elliott Wave Financial Forecast, October 2008
 Credit Default Swamps
To get an idea of just how much bigger the problem is than any possible solution the federal government can come up with, let’s look back at a financial instrument that we first introduced to Elliott Wave Financial Forecast readers in May 2005, the credit default swap (CDS). When Elliott Wave Financial Forecast first discussed these instruments in connection with the economy’s unavoidable advance toward the purge phase of the interest rate cycle, we also noted the appearance of “some whole new risk exposures such as credit default swaps, which by some estimates now total more than $8 trillion, or 2/3 of GDP.” At that point, the CDS boom had only just begun. The bar chart above shows the exponential growth that has since taken place. At $62 trillion, credit default swaps’ value hit 4.3 times annual U.S. GDP at its peak last December.

The extraordinary part that these instruments played at the very end of the Great Asset Mania’s peaking process revolves around credit’s pivotal role in the boom-bust cycle. Every boom runs higher when the willingness to lend disconnects from the value of the underlying collateral. Borrowed money ratchets up demand, pushing up prices and increasing the supply of credit. The bust comes when optimism finally wanes and the cycle reverses. Tighter credit reduces demand, driving down prices and the attendant collateral values. But the CDS introduced an intermediate step by allegedly allowing bond holders to insure against default, which they did in droves. We say allegedly because, as Conquer the Crash points out, default itself will nullify many insurance and derivatives contracts, even those that were supposed to pay off in the event of non-payment. In the summer of 2006, Elliott Wave Financial Forecast noted that CDS’s were being “widely used as insurance against default in lieu of selling distressed bonds outright.” In other words, the CDS’s delayed the selling that otherwise would have come naturally, a fitting component of the b-wave rally. The CDS market was obviously becoming a casino unto itself because total issuance eventually grew to be 6 times the total value of U.S. corporate debt. Its size and wild swings in value caused Elliott Wave Financial Forecast to issue several warnings......

...... All it took was one major credit event to bring down the CDS house. The failure of Fannie and Freddie tipped the first domino, AIG. In the chain reaction that followed, Wall Street firms used the instruments to drive each other out of business or into drastically different financial entities. According to Bloomberg, “The swaps became a one way bet on the demise of the financial institutions as traders hedged the risk that their partners might implode.” The SEC now promises to “crack down” on the unregulated CDS market, but any such move should prove superfluous, as credit default swaps will go away just as portfolio insurance disappeared after the 1987 crash. The first tick down after 7 straight years of growth has already occurred. CDS’s will, however, be long remembered as a monument to the level of complacency at a Grand Supercycle-degree peak.

(Go to URL for more.)

(Permalink)

Israelis for Obama

(Permalink)

Credit Default Swaps: The Insane Problem

by Chuck Simpson

.......Start with a simple example. Assume I know the young son of the couple next door likes to crawl into closets and play with matches. I therefore see a reasonably good shot at "winning the disaster lottery" so to speak, by buying fire insurance on their $200,000 house.

In simple terms, I now have a financial interest is seeing that disaster occurs. If the house, for whatever mysterious reason, burns down an insurance company will pay me the insured value of the house - even though I suffered no loss, financial or otherwise. My neighbor's misfortune is thus magically transformed into my good fortune. A polite way of saying I was paid $200,000, the insured value of my next-door neighbor's house, after I paid the $400 insurance premium.

Being bright and suitably equipped with an MBA from a prestigious eastern university, I well and fully understand the desirable objective of maximizing my return on investment. I can accomplish this in one or both of two ways - increasing the return or decreasing the investment.

I can increase the return by artificially increasing the value of the house - say from $200,000 to $400,000. This will allow me to collect twice as much for suffering no personal loss. The easiest way to accomplish this would be to hire one of my buddies, who happens to be a real estate appraiser, to "document" the higher value.

I could also decrease my investment - meaning the premium I paid for the insurance, say from $400 to $200. The easiest way to do this would be to hire a widely acclaimed "fire risk rating agency" to send out an inspector who will look around (or perhaps only drive by without stopping) and then solemnly declare: "This house is fireproof".

Either of the two most prominent and widely known fire rating companies would be excellent choices, based on their prior experience.

In the real world, meaning Main Street as opposed to Wall Street, this would be illegal. Against the public interest, because it encourages houses to mysteriously burn down. The insurance policies owned by people without a financial stake in the fire would be declared null and void because they are contrary to public policy, which sees minimizing the number of mysterious house fires as a good thing.........

Now change an assumption. Assume I tell 99 of my poker-playing gambler friends about the boy's strange and dangerous interest. Starting with my appraiser buddy, who's predatory income as a result of a mysterious fire will double, as a direct result of his appraisal.

Now assume the $400,000 house burns to the ground. One hundred or so insurance companies will collectively pay $40 million in claims on the loss of a single $400,000 house. The benefits of a $400,000 disaster are magically multiplied by a factor of 100 and transformed into a $40 million disaster - with one family suffering a loss and 100 families experiencing a gain. The losses of the insurance companies don't count, because, in America's capitalist society, they are in the business of writing insurance - and paying claims for losses.

But in today's society, fire is not the only disaster that can be insured against. Of particular interest, default on a home mortgage can be insured against. And possession of an interest in the mortgage or actual risk of financial loss as a result of default is not required in order to purchase the insurance.......

(Go to URL for more.)

(Permalink)

Alec Baldwin

This bailout is as if someone blew up a meth lab and insisted he collect on his homeowners policy.

(Go to URL for more.)

(Permalink)

2008-09-22 to 2008-09-28 «  » 2008-10-06 to 2008-10-12