| Omblog.net | |||
|
Blog Home By Month Recent Entries
Here are some links that we like: DailyKos Talking Points Memo Huffington Post Current TV -TYT The Young Turks Sam Seder Oliver Willis Maddow Blog Cliff Schector Bob Cesca Hullabaloo Media Matters Dean Baker Paul Krugman Rober Reich Jared Bernstein Tax.com Mahablog Frank Schaeffer FOKNews Channel Eric Alterman Glenn Greenwald Political Correction Matt Taibbi Atrios AlterNet Ezra Klein Kevin Drum John Cole Juan Cole Matthew Yglesias Firedoglake Dome on the Range Leftyblogs/Kansas Leftyblogs/Missouri Best of the Blogs Firedup Missouri Show Me Progress BAGnewNotes Baseline Scenario Zero Hedge Calculated Risk The Big Picture Tapped Blogs TPM Muckraker TPM Cafe Talk To Action Bartholomew 's Notes Things You Wouldn't Know... Rumproast The Daily Beast FAIR Blog The Authoritarians Bonddad Blog FiveThirtyEight Consumerist Future Majority ThinkProgress Campus Progress Center for American Progress OurFuture.org Crooks and Liars : AFLCIOnow Gun Guys Jesus' General Flying Spaghetti Monster Max Blumenthal Truthout BuzzFlash.com The Nation AlterNet News Hounds Liberal Oasis The Raw Story American Rights at Work
Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)
|
Blog Home : September 2008 : 2008-09-29 to 2008-10-05
Chris Rodda
On Friday, September 26, the end of a week in which thousands of copies
of Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against the West
-- the fear-mongering, anti-Muslim documentary being distributed
by the millions in swing states
via DVDs inserted in major newspapers and through the U.S. mail -- were
distributed by mail in Ohio, a "chemical irritant" was sprayed through
a window of the Islamic Society of Greater Dayton, where 300 people
were gathered for a Ramadan prayer service.
Atrios
Politico: Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and his top aides took credit for building a winning bailout coalition - hours before the vote failed and stocks tanked.
Thomas B. Edsall, Huffpost
Blame for the current economic crisis has been laid on many
doorsteps, including the Gramm-Leach-Bliley
Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999; credit
default swaps; hedge funds;
the Commodity
Futures Modernization Act of 2000; Alan Greenspan;
and Phil
and Wendy Gramm. But it has fallen to right-wing pundit Ann Coulter to blaze a
truly
simple path through the maze of credit derivatives, collateralized loan
obligations, tranches, securitization transactions, and Thomson
Financial League Tables. This gentle lady spells
out the source and origin of the current economic crisis: "THEY GAVE YOUR MORTGAGE TO A LESS QUALIFIED MINORITY!"
Hale "Bonddad" Stewart
....There are several really big assumptions in the above scenario that make no sense.
1.) The biggest stupidity is the government thinks these assets are undervalued right now and will eventually rise in value. Really. That's nice. And who is the wizard with the crystal ball? Has it occurred to anybody that these assets are correctly valued at current levels and will continue to drop? But Bonddad... Hank Paulson says that won't happen. The same thing goes for Bernanke. Neither of them saw this coming either, meaning their judgment is really suspect......
Harry Hanbury
Does Sarah Palin believe in the Anti-Christ? Does she believe true Christians will be whisked up to heaven sometime in the near future? Does she expect Jesus to come back to earth in our lifetime and battle the armies of Satan? Which nations would participate in the Battle of Armageddon, and whose side would they be on? These questions seem far out, but they're not. They cut to the core of Palin's perspectives on who holds power in our world, on humanity's future, and on foreign affairs....
.....While producing the American News Project video Palin's Apocalypse, I've been astonished at how the media avoid these questions like kryptonite - presumably for fear of being branded anti-religious or becoming the target of a boycott by fundamentalists. But Berlet, who identifies himself as "Christian and a reporter," urges his colleagues to overcome their fears......
NYT
....Ms. Palin condemned Wall Street greed and said she and Mr. McCain would "demand" strict oversight. In virtually the next breath, she said government should "get out of the way" of American business....
.....In the end, the debate did not change the essential truth of Ms. Palin’s candidacy: Mr. McCain made a wildly irresponsible choice that shattered the image he created for himself as the honest, seasoned, experienced man of principle and judgment. It was either an act of incredible cynicism or appallingly bad judgment.
The Progress Report
BLAME IT ON THE CRA: For
weeks, conservatives have blamed the 1977 Community
Reinvestment Act
(CRA), a bill aimed at helping minorities and low-income Americans
obtain mortgages, for somehow causing today's crisis. Blaming the CRA
has become a favorite
conservative talking point, peddled recently by Charles
Krauthammer, Fox
News, the Wall
Street Journal, the Washington
Times, and the National
Review. Conservatives often move from blaming
the CRA to blaming minorities themselves. Fox News's Neil
Cavuto faulted the CRA's encouraging of "loaning
to minorities and other risky folks." Bachmann last
week criticized attempts to push "homeownership
as a way to open the door for blacks
and other minorities to enter the middle class." In response, Rep.
Keith Ellison (D-MN) and other Congressional Black Caucus members wrote
to Boehner asking whether all conservatives believe that "it
was lending to minority communities
that caused the financial crisis." Ellison also pointed out that the
CRA applies only to commercial banks, not independent mortgage
companies, which created the majority of subprime loans. "The fact is, CRAs
probably reduced the impact of this problem
because they limited the ability for a subprime loan to be issued
through banks because they were regulated," he said. As the Center for
American Progress's Robert Gordon has noted, "[T]he real
problems came from the institutions
beyond the reach of the CRA." CRA institutions engaged in less
dangerous lending, as independent mortgage companies "made high-priced
loans at more
than twice the rate of the banks and thrifts."
If your family makes $40,000, he wants you to pay taxes on $52,000 by adding in your employer health benefits.
Robert Reich
.....The larger economic outlook is not encouraging. All signs point to the economy worsening, bailout or no bailout. Unemployment will continue to rise. Median earnings will continue to drop, adjusted for inflation. More Americans will lose their health insurance.
The Era of Angry Populism has only just begun. Let's hope Obama wins, and is able to mobilize the anger into fierce pressure on Congress to get his agenda enacted, as well as reform Wall Street and Washington.
The extraordinary part that these instruments played at
the very
end of the Great Asset Mania’s peaking process revolves
around credit’s
pivotal role in the boom-bust cycle. Every boom runs higher when the
willingness to lend disconnects from the value of the underlying
collateral. Borrowed money ratchets up demand, pushing up prices and
increasing the supply of credit. The bust comes when optimism finally
wanes and the cycle reverses. Tighter credit reduces demand, driving
down prices and the attendant collateral values. But the CDS introduced
an intermediate step by allegedly allowing bond holders to insure
against default, which they did in droves. We say allegedly because, as
Conquer the Crash points out, default itself
will nullify many
insurance and derivatives contracts, even those that were supposed to
pay off in the event of non-payment. In the summer of 2006, Elliott
Wave Financial Forecast noted that CDS’s were being
“widely used as
insurance against default in lieu of selling distressed bonds
outright.” In other words, the CDS’s delayed the
selling that otherwise
would have come naturally, a fitting component of the b-wave rally. The
CDS market was obviously becoming a casino unto itself because total
issuance eventually grew to be 6 times the total value of U.S.
corporate debt. Its size and wild swings in value caused Elliott Wave
Financial Forecast to issue several warnings......
by Chuck Simpson
.......Start with a simple example. Assume I know the young son of the couple next door likes to crawl into closets and play with matches. I therefore see a reasonably good shot at "winning the disaster lottery" so to speak, by buying fire insurance on their $200,000 house.
In simple terms, I now have a financial interest is seeing that disaster occurs. If the house, for whatever mysterious reason, burns down an insurance company will pay me the insured value of the house - even though I suffered no loss, financial or otherwise. My neighbor's misfortune is thus magically transformed into my good fortune. A polite way of saying I was paid $200,000, the insured value of my next-door neighbor's house, after I paid the $400 insurance premium.
Being bright and suitably equipped with an MBA from a prestigious eastern university, I well and fully understand the desirable objective of maximizing my return on investment. I can accomplish this in one or both of two ways - increasing the return or decreasing the investment.
I can increase the return by artificially increasing the value of the house - say from $200,000 to $400,000. This will allow me to collect twice as much for suffering no personal loss. The easiest way to accomplish this would be to hire one of my buddies, who happens to be a real estate appraiser, to "document" the higher value.
I could also decrease my investment - meaning the premium I paid for the insurance, say from $400 to $200. The easiest way to do this would be to hire a widely acclaimed "fire risk rating agency" to send out an inspector who will look around (or perhaps only drive by without stopping) and then solemnly declare: "This house is fireproof".
Either of the two most prominent and widely known fire rating companies would be excellent choices, based on their prior experience.
In the real world, meaning Main Street as opposed to Wall Street, this would be illegal. Against the public interest, because it encourages houses to mysteriously burn down. The insurance policies owned by people without a financial stake in the fire would be declared null and void because they are contrary to public policy, which sees minimizing the number of mysterious house fires as a good thing.........
Now change an assumption. Assume I tell 99 of my poker-playing gambler friends about the boy's strange and dangerous interest. Starting with my appraiser buddy, who's predatory income as a result of a mysterious fire will double, as a direct result of his appraisal.
Now assume the $400,000 house burns to the ground. One hundred or so insurance companies will collectively pay $40 million in claims on the loss of a single $400,000 house. The benefits of a $400,000 disaster are magically multiplied by a factor of 100 and transformed into a $40 million disaster - with one family suffering a loss and 100 families experiencing a gain. The losses of the insurance companies don't count, because, in America's capitalist society, they are in the business of writing insurance - and paying claims for losses.
But in today's society, fire is not the only disaster that can be insured against. Of particular interest, default on a home mortgage can be insured against. And possession of an interest in the mortgage or actual risk of financial loss as a result of default is not required in order to purchase the insurance.......
This bailout is as if someone blew up a meth lab and insisted he collect on his homeowners policy.
| ||