| Omblog.net | |||
|
Blog Home By Month Recent Entries
Here are some links that we like: DailyKos Talking Points Memo Huffington Post Current TV -TYT The Young Turks Sam Seder Oliver Willis Maddow Blog Cliff Schector Bob Cesca Hullabaloo Media Matters Dean Baker Paul Krugman Rober Reich Jared Bernstein Tax.com Mahablog Frank Schaeffer FOKNews Channel Eric Alterman Glenn Greenwald Political Correction Matt Taibbi Atrios AlterNet Ezra Klein Kevin Drum John Cole Juan Cole Matthew Yglesias Firedoglake Dome on the Range Leftyblogs/Kansas Leftyblogs/Missouri Best of the Blogs Firedup Missouri Show Me Progress BAGnewNotes Baseline Scenario Zero Hedge Calculated Risk The Big Picture Tapped Blogs TPM Muckraker TPM Cafe Talk To Action Bartholomew 's Notes Things You Wouldn't Know... Rumproast The Daily Beast FAIR Blog The Authoritarians Bonddad Blog FiveThirtyEight Consumerist Future Majority ThinkProgress Campus Progress Center for American Progress OurFuture.org Crooks and Liars : AFLCIOnow Gun Guys Jesus' General Flying Spaghetti Monster Max Blumenthal Truthout BuzzFlash.com The Nation AlterNet News Hounds Liberal Oasis The Raw Story American Rights at Work
Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)
|
Blog Home : November 2009 : 2009-11-16 to 2009-11-22
MSNBC
Zero Hedge Blog
The last time Bill yields turned negative (in essence investors paying
the Government to
hold their money for them) was in the days after the Lehman bankruptcy,
when the entire world was about to blow up. So why did Bill yield for
January maturity just turn negative once again? In other words, why are
investors suddenly running for the hills? As Dow Jones reports, January
and February bills hit a yield of -0.03% earlier.
Some explanations have to do with Bill scarcity, as nobody wants to be
exposed to anything beyond 3 months down the curve, let alone 1 year.
However, the fact that bond investors may not be buying into the whole
recovery BS (or just realize that there is nobody willing to roll
near-dated treasurys into longer-tenor pieces of paper) and are once
again running scared and willing to pay Ben Bernanke to hold their
money for them should be very, very troubling. Additionally, could
there be something more pressing and/or catalytic? We have not heard
peep from any of the big banks in a while...
Frank
| ||