Omblog.net
Blog Home
By Month
Recent Entries

Send email to omblog.net
Here are some links that we like:
DailyKos
Talking Points Memo
Huffington Post
The Centrist Word
Current TV -TYT
The Young Turks
Electablog & LOLGOP
Sam Seder
Oliver Willis
Maddow Blog
Cliff Schector
Bob Cesca
Hullabaloo
Media Matters
Dean Baker
Paul Krugman
Rober Reich
Jared Bernstein
Tax.com
Mahablog
Frank Schaeffer
FOKNews Channel
Eric Alterman
Glenn Greenwald
Political Correction
Matt Taibbi
Atrios
AlterNet
Ezra Klein
Kevin Drum
John Cole
Juan Cole
Matthew Yglesias
Firedoglake
Dome on the Range
Leftyblogs/Kansas
Leftyblogs/Missouri
Best of the Blogs
Firedup Missouri
Show Me Progress
BAGnewNotes
Baseline Scenario
Zero Hedge
Calculated Risk
The Big Picture
Tapped Blogs
TPM Muckraker
TPM Cafe
Talk To Action
Bartholomew 's Notes
Things You Wouldn't Know...
Rumproast
The Daily Beast
FAIR Blog
The Authoritarians
Bonddad Blog
FiveThirtyEight
Consumerist
Future Majority
ThinkProgress
Campus Progress
Center for American Progress
OurFuture.org
Crooks and Liars :
AFLCIOnow
Gun Guys
Jesus' General
Flying Spaghetti Monster
Max Blumenthal

Truthout
BuzzFlash.com
The Nation
AlterNet
News Hounds
Liberal Oasis
The Raw Story
American Rights at Work


Search this site powered by FreeFind
How is news coverage working for you? Pop Quiz: How Many soldiers have we lost this Month?

Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)


legitgov

4more

sweetjesus

Jesus' General


Blog Home : December 2011 : 2011-12-26 to 2012-01-01

Newt and the Loony Religious Fringe That Now Runs the Republican Party

Frank Schaeffer

.....Gary North, who apparently channels both Ayn Rand and Attila the Hun when reading his Bible, has seriously argued that in the Sermon on the Mount the commandments about love are "recommendations for the ethical conduct of a captive people."

North says that when Jesus commands us to agree with adversaries quickly, to go the second mile, to turn the other cheek, He is really doing nothing more than telling us how to survive captivity at the hands of unbelieving rulers while we -- Jews under the pagan Romans then, American Christians under the wicked U.S. Federal Government now -- are not in power. Once we take over the government and the "unbelieving ruler" is overthrown, then Jesus' ethics no longer applies. Once we take over, according to North, the Christian should no longer go the second mile to love others as he loves himself, let alone turn the other cheek to those who hurt him.

Once Christians are in charge, according to North we, "should either bust him in the chops or haul him before the magistrate, and possibly both." North says, and I quote (no kidding), "It is only in a period of civil impotence that Christians are under the rule to 'resist not evil '." In other words, I suppose the "lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil" part of the Lord's Prayer no longer applies, once we've got "the power, the glory and the kingdom"--at least until Jesus comes back.

How far would the Reconstructionists go? For North, the death penalty (preferably by stoning people to death) should be part of our law. "The question eventually must be raised," he writes in a book on economics and the Ten Commandments. "Is it a criminal offence to take the name of the Lord in vain? When people curse their parents, it unquestionably is a capital crime (Exodus. 21:17). The son or daughter is under the lawful jurisdiction of the family. The integrity of the family must be maintained by the threat of death. Clearly, cursing God (blasphemy) is a comparable crime, and is therefore a capital crime (Leviticus. 24:16)." .....

(Go to URL for more.)

(Permalink)

2011-10-24 to 2011-10-30 «  » 2012-01-02 to 2012-01-08